The wording of the Malawi Constitution has on more than one occasion begged for interpretation from our learned colleagues in the judiciary. In the latest instance, the Constitutional Court in delivering its judgement that nullified Malawi’s 2019 presidential election result, interpreted the word ‘majority’ in Section 80 (2) of the country’s supreme law to mean securing 50 plus one percent of the votes cast. In doing so, they overturned an earlier ruling that said a majority simply meant the first one past the post. In 2009, Malawi’s former president Bakili Muluzi, seeking to spring back to Sanjika also petitioned the court to try and explain what the Constitution meant by two ‘consecutive terms’. In his understanding, which I think makes sense, consecutive meant one after the other. To him, a person could serve as President for two consecutive terms, take a breather, put their feet up, probably on a ...